Google Books deal still causing a fracas
Claims it undermines current copyright laws
Google's plan to digitize the world's out-of-print books has hit another snag in the form of the US Justice Department.
The department has filed an opinion at the federal court in New York which notes that the latest settlement agreement proposed by Google "suffers from the same core problem as the original agreement."
The original agreement was, unsurprisingly, also rejected by the Department of Justice, who discarded it on anti-trust and copyright issues.
"It is an attempt to use the class action mechanism to implement forward-looking business arrangements that go far beyond the dispute before the court in this litigation," continued the DoJ's opinion – one which is backed up by the Consumer Watchdog.
Looking forward
Where this leaves Google's plans to bring the world's hard-to-find books to the internet is unknown. There is a hearing 18 February to discuss the matter further.
In a statement, Google said about the DoJ's findings: "We look forward to Judge Chin's review of the statement of interest from the Department and the comments from the many supporters who have filed submissions with the court in the last months.
Get the best Black Friday deals direct to your inbox, plus news, reviews, and more.
Sign up to be the first to know about unmissable Black Friday deals on top tech, plus get all your favorite TechRadar content.
"If approved by the court, the settlement will significantly expand online access to works through Google Books, while giving authors and publishers new ways to distribute their works."
And if it doesn't, then expect this matter to go through the courts all over again.
Via FT.com
Marc Chacksfield is the Editor In Chief, Shortlist.com at DC Thomson. He started out life as a movie writer for numerous (now defunct) magazines and soon found himself online - editing a gaggle of gadget sites, including TechRadar, Digital Camera World and Tom's Guide UK. At Shortlist you'll find him mostly writing about movies and tech, so no change there then.