Call me, maybe: Why I want the Apple Watch 3 LTE

Apple Watch has come a long way since it was first introduced in 2015. Today, we met the culmination of the last two years (has it really only been two years?) in the Apple Watch 3.

This is Apple's first LTE connected smartwatch, though there's also a standard model that lacks LTE. Both went up for pre-order on September 15, and go on sale September 22.

If you go the cellular route, you'll be able to perform a number of tasks on your Apple Watch 3 without your phone nearby, such as making calls and streaming 40 million songs from Apple Music. You can leave your phone at home while you go about your business, yet stay connected and experience no dip in your Watch's functionality.

LTE makes the Apple Watch 3 the first Apple smartwatch that I'm genuinely interested in buying. Interested, yes, but ready to commit? That's a slightly different matter.

Wrist phone

My thinking on the Apple Watch (and smartwatches in general) has been: yes, they are neat, but if you need a phone to get full use out of it, what's the point? 

There are smartwatches with LTE already, such as the LG Watch Sport, Huawei Watch 2 and Samsung Gear S3. I've steered away from these for several reasons, including their size, style and because I use an iPhone as my primary phone. 

I've had my eye on the Apple Watch 2, yet despite marked improvements over the first Apple Watch, it's always felt superfluous. I could never justify the purchase - why buy another device that can't even function fully without an iPhone close by?

The Apple Watch 3 changes the game for me. I'm not a big phone talker - who is anymore? - but when I factor in that I could make and receive calls on my Apple Watch 3 and perform formerly iPhone-reliant functions in addition to the watch's other eye-catching features, it starts to sound a lot more appealing. 

Here's something I wouldn't feel completely guilty buying.

While giving up my phone isn't an option if I took the Apple Watch 3 plunge, I would be able to leave it behind if I chose and not feel like I'm wearing an expensive chunk of useless metal on my wrist. 

It's freeing to go out without a phone, yet that's not always a good option. I regularly go for long walks, jogs and hikes, and bringing my phone often feels like a necessary burden. It'd be great to not have to take it, but the need to make a call if something happens or listen to motivational music outweighs this desire.

I regularly go for long walks, jogs and hikes, and bringing my phone often feels like a necessary burden

With the Apple Watch 3, I wouldn't be faced with this choice (though I would have to buy a pair of Bluetooth headphones). 

There is a price to pay

Aside from LTE, there's not much separating the Apple Watch 3 from the Apple Watch 2. There is a faster processor in the new model, which should bring a welcome boost to performance, and battery life should be improved when not using LTE. Oh, and the digital crown has a red dot on the top now.

I'm not too bothered by the lack of standout new design changes on the Apple Watch 3, particularly because it keeps the size of the Apple Watch 2 while packing more in.

Where my hesitancy starts to creep in is price. The Apple Watch 3 with LTE costs $399/£399/AU$559, and that doesn't include carrier fees. 

US carriers are charging $10 a month for Apple Watch 3 cellular service. This adds up to $120 a year, on top of what you paid for the watch, plus your regular phone service. 

Verizon, AT&T, Sprint and T-Mobile are offering three free months of service, so that delivers some savings. These offers, however, won't last forever.

The price of connecting the Apple Watch 3 LTE is big, and it's a factor I'll have to consider before committing to the new Apple Watch for good. So far, though, it's done plenty to convince me it's worth at least trying on. 

Michelle Fitzsimmons

Michelle was previously a news editor at TechRadar, leading consumer tech news and reviews. Michelle is now a Content Strategist at Facebook.  A versatile, highly effective content writer and skilled editor with a keen eye for detail, Michelle is a collaborative problem solver and covered everything from smartwatches and microprocessors to VR and self-driving cars.

Latest in Smartwatches
Pebble smartwatch countdown
Pebble confirms its smartwatch announcement is just hours away
Apple Watch Ultra 2 settings
I've been using an Apple Watch for 10 years – here are three common mistakes even I've made
Huawei Watch Fit 3
The Huawei Watch 3 is a decent Apple Watch alternative, and its successor could be close at hand
Garmin Instinct 3 in Neotropic Green
"I'm an idiot": Garmin user reveals how fixing one setting completely changed their training after months of making no progress
A garmin forerrunner 55 on an orange background with the phrase lowest price
Sprint! The best cheap Garmin for runners is back down to its lowest-ever price
Half-Life running on a smartwatch
This Redditor installed a game engine on their smartwatch, and now it runs Doom, Quake, and Half-Life
Latest in News
Panos Panay and Alexa Plus
Amazon's Panos Panay teases future Alexa+ devices from speakers to possible wearables
Metroid Prime 4
I reckon the Nintendo Switch 2 could launch with Metroid Prime 4 – here’s why
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6
New rumors predict a foldable iPhone will launch next year – and cost almost twice as much as the iPhone 16 Pro Max
Pebble smartwatch countdown
Pebble confirms its smartwatch announcement is just hours away
Logo of YouTube Shorts
Is YouTube auto-playing Shorts when you open the app? Well, you’re not alone - here’s how to fix it
Google DeepMind panel discussion
“More sovereignty and protection” - Google goes all-in on UK AI with data residency, upskilling projects, and startup investments