More chip cores can mean slower computing

Don't hold your breath for sixteen-core processors from Intel
Don't hold your breath for sixteen-core processors from Intel

If dual-core computers are fast and quad-core machines even faster, then octo-core machines will approach the speed of light, right?

Wrong. Supercomputer researchers at Sandia National Laboratories have found that increasing the number of processors cores on individual chips actually worsens performance for many complex applications.

Sandia, whose Paragon device was the world's first parallel processing supercomputer, is a big player in the esoteric world of proto-exaflop computing.

Researchers there created a simulation of the next generation of supercomputers, and found a significant increase in speed going from two to four multicores, but an insignificant increase from four to eight multicores.

Not so sweet sixteen

Exceeding eight multicores causes a decrease in speed. Sixteen multicores perform barely as well as two, and after that, a steep decline is registered as more cores are added.

The problem is the lack of memory bandwidth as well as contention between processors over the memory bus available to each processor.

"The difficulty is contention among modules," says James Peery, director of Sandia's Computations, Computers, Information and Mathematics Centre. "The cores are all asking for memory through the same pipe. It's like having one, two, four, or eight people all talking to you at the same time, saying, 'I want this information.' Then they have to wait until the answer to their request comes back. This causes delays."

Multicore technologies have been considered a possible saviour of Moore's Law (the prediction that the number of transistors that can be placed inexpensively on an integrated circuit will double approximately every two years).

Multicore systems grew in popularity after clock speeds (and thus power consumption) on single chips became high enough to generate awkward quantities of heat.

This may be a problem affecting only supercomputers today, but unless researchers find a way around either the contention or the heat problems, the rapid advance in desktop computer processor technology could start to slow down, too.

Mark Harris is Senior Research Director at Gartner.

Latest in CPU
AMD Ryzen AI
New leak suggests AMD's working on an Arm-based processor to rival Qualcomm's Snapdragon X series
AMD Ryzen 9950X3D chip next to its packaging on a pink table
Asus' AI Cache Boost promises to "pump up" your AMD Ryzen 9000 processor's AI performance
An AMD Ryzen processor slotted into a motherboard
Future AMD-powered gaming handhelds and notebooks could miss out on a key feature – and it might be a deal breaker for gamers
John Loeffler holding the Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Great news! The best gaming CPU ever made is finally available for its original launch price again
The Ryzen AI Max+ 395 could power the latest generation of powerful mini PCs
The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 dominates as the "most powerful" APU on the market, but its competition is questionable
Intel Lunar Lake concept
Intel's Panther Lake processors won't arrive until Q1 2026 - corroborates previous delay rumors despite former Intel CEO's promise of 2025 launch
Latest in News
Apple Watch Ultra 2 timer
The Apple Watch is getting a sleep alarm upgrade it probably should have had 10 years ago
Nikon Z5
The Nikon Z5 II could land soon – here's what to expect from Nikon's rumored entry-level full-frame camera
Google Pixel Watch 3
Google Pixel Watches hit with delayed notifications, crashing, and performance issues following Wear OS 5.1 update
Zendesk Relate 2025
Zendesk Relate 2025 - everything you need to know as the event unfolds
Disney Plus logo with popcorn
You can finally tell Disney+ to stop bugging you about that terrible Marvel show you regret starting
Google Gemini AI
Gemini can now see your screen and judge your tabs