Intel Arc GPUs just can’t compete with NVIDIA GeForce for content creation

Content creator at computer in home office
(Image credit: Unsplash / Nubelson Fernandes)

Intel Arc - the company’s “doomed” and controversial new graphics cards - has taken a battering in Puget System’s latest benchmark tests

Trying out the new Intel Arc A750 8GB and the Arc A770 16GB graphic cards, which released on October 12, the custom PC builder discovered that performance was less than spectacular compared to NVIDIA’s popular GeForce RTX 3060.

While Intel’s GPUs are primarily focused on gaming, meaning content creation is sometimes a secondary concern, the firm admitted, "we ran into a number of instances where we were missing software support, or where a planned feature wasn't working quite right."

Creating content (slowly)

Performing a series of tests in DaVinci Resolve - our top pick for best free video editing software - results showed both Arc graphics cards struggled when pitted against GeForce RTX 3060 12GB. Overall, NVIDIA’s offering was found to be 20-30% faster than either. 

Digging deeper, the company turned its attention to GPU effects and RAW debrayering. Once again, GeForce out-performed the competition, with effects processing 10-20% faster and debrayering approximately 50% faster. 

When it came to H.264 encoding and decoding, it was barely a competition at all. The GeForce RTX 3060 out-stripped Intel’s duo, with near-identical results when decoding on the Nvidia GPU and Intel's iGPU.

Compounding the issue, Puget Systems discovered that “when using the Intel Arc card plus the iGPU (with Resolve set to use "Intel Quick Sync" for decoding), we saw slightly lower performance than we did with either the iGPU or NVDEC with the RTX 3060."

"Performance was even lower if we only used the Arc card (with the iGPU disabled),” it added. 

However, there was better news on the encoding front. When pairing the Arc A770 with the iGPU, the firm found it to be 43% faster than the native encoder with the Core i9 12900K and 32% faster than using the Intel iGPU alone. 

The Intel Arc A750, on the other hand, was less speedy - but the results show some potential, the company claimed. 

Benchmarks were also run in Adobe Premiere Pro, Adobe After Effects, Unreal Engine, and top 3D modeling and animation software Blender. 

Results were more encouraging here. The A770 readily competes (but couldn’t quite beat) the GeForce card in both Adobe’s best video editing software and its VFX software. The A750 fared less well, but held its own - particularly in Premiere Pro. But, as Puget Systems noted, CPU is far more important in After Effects. 

In Unreal Engine - which hints at Intel’s intent to attract not just gamers but also game developers - it was found that “looking at performance in Unreal Engine, the Arc A770 is roughly 8.5% faster than the NVIDIA RTX 3060, while the A750 is 7% slower."

For graphic design artists, both Intel Arc GPUs put on a staggeringly poor performance - leaving NVIDIA the only game in town when it comes to professional rendering. 

Despite concerns that the high-end Arc GPUs offered a sub-par experience for content creators, Puget Systems did at least find that video editing benefitted from Intel’s Deep Link Technology, which allows Arc dGPU and Intel's iGPU to work together.  

Steve Clark
B2B Editor - Creative & Hardware

Steve is B2B Editor for Creative & Hardware at TechRadar Pro. He began in tech journalism reviewing photo editors and video editing software at Web User magazine, and covered technology news, features, and how-to guides. Today, he and his team of expert reviewers test out a range of creative software, hardware, and office furniture. Once upon a time, he wrote TV commercials and movie trailers. Relentless champion of the Oxford comma.

Read more
An Intel Arc B580 on a table
Arc B580 surprises in content creation review: Intel's 12GB GPU is more than a match for the competition but driver issues dampened my enthusiasm
An Intel Arc B580 on a table
Intel is taking the budget GPU market by storm - leaked Arc B570 benchmark shows solid performance for a very reasonable price
An Intel Arc B580 on a table
Intel Arc B580 review: A spectacular success for Intel and a gateway to 1440p for gamers on a budget
An Intel Arc B570 next to its retail packaging
Intel Arc B570 review: great value, but overshadowed by the far superior Arc B580
Adobe After Effects GPU Roundup
Nvidia Geforce GPUs obliterate the competition in this popular video sofware benchmark
Intel Logo
Intel's rumored 'Celestial' GPUs could finally give Nvidia and AMD cause for concern
Latest in Software & Services
woman listening to computer
AWS vs Azure: choosing the right platform to maximize your company's investment
A person at a desktop computer working on spreadsheet tables.
Trello vs Jira: which project management solution is best for you?
Autonomous finance
Quickbooks vs Quicken: what are the main strengths and weaknesses for your business
finance
Quickbooks vs Xero: which is the best for your business?
Group of people meeting
Zoom vs Google Meet: which is the best video conferencing tool for your business?
Fingers typing on a computer keyboard.
Microsoft 365 Personal vs Microsoft 365 Family: are there any real differences?
Latest in News
Pebble smartwatch countdown
Pebble confirms its smartwatch announcement is just hours away
Google DeepMind panel discussion
“More sovereignty and protection” - Google goes all-in on UK AI with data residency, upskilling projects, and startup investments
Nintendo Switch 2
Nintendo Switch 2 expected to have AI upscaling and I can't wait to finally play Tears of the Kingdom with upgraded graphics
PowerColor Red Devil AMD RX 9070 XT graphics card shown side-on
Your next GPU could be from AMD, not Nvidia, if Team Red’s success with PC gamers continues
Intel Lunar Lake concept
Intel's Panther Lake processors won't arrive until Q1 2026 - corroborates previous delay rumors despite former Intel CEO's promise of 2025 launch
Quordle on a smartphone held in a hand
Quordle hints and answers for Tuesday, March 18 (game #1149)