Why you can trust TechRadar We spend hours testing every product or service we review, so you can be sure you’re buying the best. Find out more about how we test.
We chose three rival cameras to the X-T10 to see how it measured up in our lab tests: the Panasonic G7, Olympus OM-D E-M10 and Sony A6000.
We've carried out lab tests on the X-T10 across its full ISO range for resolution, noise (including signal to noise ratio) and dynamic range. We test the JPEGs shot by the camera, but we also check the performance with raw files. Most enthusiasts and pros prefer to shoot raw, and the results can often be quite different.
Fuji X-T10 Resolution charts
We test camera resolution using an industry-standard ISO test chart that allows precise visual comparisons. This gives us numerical values for resolution in line widths/picture height, and you can see how the X-T10 compares with its rivals in the charts below.
JPEG resolution analysis: While the X-T10 produces images that have an impression of lots of detail, at the lower sensitivity settings it struggles to match the resolution scores of the Panasonic G7, which has a smaller (Four Thirds type) sensor.
Raw (converted to TIFF) resolution analysis: The X-T10's raw files (after conversion to TIFF) match the JPEGs for detail resolution, and lag a little behind the G7 at low to mid sensitivity settings. As we would expect, though the X-T10 scores well for a 16Mp camera, it can't match the 24Mp Sony A6000.
