AMD FX-4300 review

Look, it's the emperor's new processor…

AMD FX-4300
AMD FX-4300

TechRadar Verdict

Pros

  • +

    OK performance

  • +

    Decent overclocking ability

Cons

  • -

    No performance increase over last gen

  • -

    Too close in price to FX-6300

Why you can trust TechRadar We spend hours testing every product or service we review, so you can be sure you’re buying the best. Find out more about how we test.

The last few months have left me with a rather positive feeling towards AMD. It's the plucky little upstart, which is trying to maintain some competitiveness against the might of Intel, and with the Piledriver update to its CPU lineup we're seeing some decent little budget chips.

The FX-4300, though, is really testing that goodwill because I'm struggling to figure out what the point of it is.

The original Bulldozer FX-4170 had the same dual-module, quad-core make-up and ran at an industry-leading 4.2GHz straight out of the box. I was also able to push it up to about 5GHz with some fairly rudimentary overclocking.

Sadly though, with the FX-6200 being so close in price - roughly $20 more - there was little point opting for the quad-core chip when the six-core version offered similar speeds with an extra Bulldozer module.

What was true then is just as true now. If it wasn't a literary impossibility I'd say it was even truer… there's just over a fiver between the price of the six- and four-core Piledriver CPUs, and that makes the weaker of the two essentially pointless.

Like the FX-6300, AMD has opted to drop the clockspeed of the FX-4300 compared to the previous generation, so it now doesn't even have the pleasure of calling itself a 4GHz+ chip out of the box.

It's still more than capable of achieving some impressive overclocking - I was able to quickly ramp up the clocks to 5.11GHz by following the same process as with the six-core chip - but even then it's lagging behind the FX-6300. And sadly, because of that slower clockspeed, it's also lagging behind the FX-4170.

Benchmarks

CPU rendering performance
Cinebench R11.5: Index score: Higher is better

AMD FX-4300: 3.13
AMD FX-4170: 3.11
INTEL CORE I3-3225: 3.25

CPU encoding performance
x264 v4.0: Frames per second: Higher is better

AMD FX-4300: 19.11
AMD FX-4170: 20.20
INTEL CORE I3-3225: 18.82

CPU gaming performance
Batman: AC: Frames per second: Higher is better

AMD FX-4300: 107
AMD FX-4170: 109
INTEL CORE I3-3225: 126

Hobbled

The whole point of the Piledriver upgrade was, well, to upgrade the existing lineup. The fact that, on the quad-core side at least, we're looking at a retrograde step is rather worrying. Yes, the architecture may have been improved beyond the original Bulldozer spec, but for reasons unknown, AMD decided to drop the speed of this part by 400MHz, hobbling any performance increase in the process.

Again it's got a lower TDP at 95W, but then so has the hex-core, so it's not even like the quad-core chip can make more of a case for itself in small-form factor rigs. Had AMD decided to release this chip with more of a sensible price gap between it and the next processor in the lineup, there might have been a case to make for this quadcore Piledriver.

At $125 this would have been tempting for the rig-builder on a tight budget - it happily outstrips the Ivy Bridge i3 in terms of multi-threaded goodness and can be pushed up to speeds that beat it in gaming terms too. The Core i3 is locked so it has no OC love to give, y'see.

Sadly, AMD hasn't made a clear distinction between this and the hex-core FX-6300, and without a serious price cut we'd recommend anyone on a tight CPU budget to bypass the FX-4300 and look closely at the FX-6300 instead. In all honesty, this is a bit of a waste of good silicon.

TOPICS
Latest in CPU
AMD Ryzen AI
New leak suggests AMD's working on an Arm-based processor to rival Qualcomm's Snapdragon X series
AMD Ryzen 9950X3D chip next to its packaging on a pink table
Asus' AI Cache Boost promises to "pump up" your AMD Ryzen 9000 processor's AI performance
An AMD Ryzen processor slotted into a motherboard
Future AMD-powered gaming handhelds and notebooks could miss out on a key feature – and it might be a deal breaker for gamers
John Loeffler holding the Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Great news! The best gaming CPU ever made is finally available for its original launch price again
The Ryzen AI Max+ 395 could power the latest generation of powerful mini PCs
The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 dominates as the "most powerful" APU on the market, but its competition is questionable
Intel Lunar Lake concept
Intel's Panther Lake processors won't arrive until Q1 2026 - corroborates previous delay rumors despite former Intel CEO's promise of 2025 launch
Latest in Reviews
The Kiwi design K4 Boost Battery strap being worn by Hamish
I test VR headsets for a living, and this affordable headstrap is the first Meta Quest 3 accessory you should buy
Both Kiwi design G4 Pro Performance Controller Grips
I thought VR controller grips were pointless until this Meta Quest 3 accessory proved me wrong
The Kiwi design H4 Boost Halo Battery Strap
Want to upgrade your VR headset? Look no further than my new favorite Meta Quest 3 headstrap
WithSecure Elements EPP and EDR main image
I tested the WithSecure Elements EPP and EDR - read how I rated this Endpoint Protection for small business
The RIG M2 Streamstar.
I wanted to love the new RIG M2 Streamstar, but this pricey gaming microphone fails to deliver
Bambu Lab H2D Vs X1C
I've been reviewing the hotly anticipated Bambu Lab H2D for a month, and it's the most versatile machine I've ever used